News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Windsor supports Labor: broadband the key 

Windsor supports Labor: broadband the key

07 Sep, 2010 03:39 PM
Tony Windsor has decided to support Labor, but the remaining independent MP Rob Oakeshott is yet to make public his decision.

The decision came after 17 days of protracted negotiation between the independents and the two leaders.

Mr Oakeshott had six separate meetings yesterday with Mr Abbott.

One source said this morning that when Mr Oakeshott and Mr Windsor met Mr Abbott last night, the Coalition leader offered them ''everything'''.

The stakes were raised earlier this afternoon when Queensland independent Bob Katter called a press conference to declare his hand before his two independent colleagues, both from NSW.

Mr Katter announced he was backing the Coalition to form a minority government, and indicated his decision would have been different had Kevin Rudd still been Labor leader.

The trio met Ms Gillard and Mr Abbott this morning before they announced their decision.

Mr Oakeshott described the task of anointing a government as a ''wicked problem''.

Mr Windsor said both leaders had been excellent in their dealings with the independents.

''They both want the job - there is no doubt about that,'' he said.

Throughout the entire process, the men never once stated a positive reason as to why they would choose the Coalition. This seeded a deep pessimism within the Liberal and National Parties.

On Monday , at the 11th hour, they also raised the uncertain status of Tony Crook, the breakaway WA national who had refused to support the Coalition in a minority government unless his demands were met.

The independents had also held out until both parties agreed to a major reforms to the parliament. The Coalition had refused to agree to three points on Sunday but rolled over on Monday as negotiations intensified.

Last night, the Coalition secured the critical support of Mr Crook after the trio said without him, the Coalition did not have the numbers to form government.

In a bombshell on the eve of today's expected decision by the three independents, they declared Mr Crook had asked for $860 million a year for Western Australia's regions, no mining tax, and a rewrite of the GST funding formula so WA receives more revenue.

But after the independents sounded their warning, Mr Crook crumbled in response to an appeal from the Nationals federal leader, Warren Truss, and severely weakened his bargaining position.

''I will support the Coalition to form a minority government,'' he said.

''But I would like to make it clear that there has been no commitment or agreement on our key policy, therefore I will be on the cross benches until that policy is met.''

The Crook situation was the last hurdle to be cleared before the independents announce their respective decisions.

Mr Crook's spokeswoman confirmed that his guaranteed support to form minority government is a promise to support the Coalition against all reckless no-confidence motions and to guarantee supply, thus ensuring it stays in power for three years.

The Tasmanian independent, Andrew Wilkie, has given Labor the same commitment, as has the Greens MP Adam Bandt. Unlike Mr Crook, however, both secured payoffs in return.

Coalition sources regarded the last-minute demand by the three independents as a further sign that the trio was preparing reasons to support Ms Gillard.

Mr Oakeshott gave further grist to the theory by saying the Greens holding the balance of power in the Senate was a strong influence to support Labor, given Labor and the Greens work well together.

''That is a pragmatic reality we all have to get used to, like it or not,'' he said.

But Mr Oakeshott and Mr Windsor teased that they could still back the Coalition.

Asked whether their late concern about Mr Crook showed they were still contemplating voting for the Coalition, they did not give a direct answer.

Labor's national broadband network was one of the "main influences" for Tony Windor's backing of the Labor party, the independent MP said today.

"To pass up that opportunity and miss it for the millions of country Australians I thought was too good an opportunity to miss," he said at a packed media conference in Canberra.

"That’s been one of the main influences I’ve had in making a decision."

He said that there were many broadband technologies available, but fibre was one of the best.

"Do it once, do it right and do it with fibre," he said.

"One of the key issues in my mind is that of many country Australians."

Phillip Coorey is the chief political correspondent for The Sydney Morning Herald.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Windsor, Now you have indicated you are a Labor politician, prepare to be thrown out of office next election
Posted by Jon, 7/09/2010 3:51:47 PM
exactly Jon, the man is a disgrace, he was elected as a conservative independent and now he's going to foist the CPRS and and the MRRT. Message for New England, dont vote for this wolf in sheeps clothing!
Posted by B, 7/09/2010 4:24:20 PM
This is fantastic news
Posted by Jaison, 7/09/2010 4:40:58 PM
All he's indicated is that he's not a Liberal politician. If that makes his voters angry, perhaps they should have voted Liberal then.
Posted by Alex, 7/09/2010 4:47:19 PM
if the constituents of new england had wanted a liberal government so vehemently, I imagine they would have voted differently...and you odd angry shots are forgetting that New England will gain some, I'm sure visible, largesse from this whole process... Much respect for Tony, always conducts himself with dignity
Posted by Don, 7/09/2010 5:04:44 PM
I'd rather an indendent any day than a party stooge...if your in a safe Liberal seat like me your electorate will see near zero Federal spending and that was even the case when Howard & Co ran the show for all those years.
Posted by dusty, 7/09/2010 5:45:40 PM
When are we going to get an independent in Braddon ----Sid nice guy but ....................
Posted by mike, 7/09/2010 6:40:34 PM
God help us all, for nothing can save this government, democracy died today, when a handful of power hungry individuals are allowed to manipulate the constitution, by empowering a party with the least primary vote is nothing short of dictatorial behaviour. The bias acts of these independents was on show from the outset, they are nothing but labor stooges who have joined the cloak and dagger of that party. This decision is a stab in the back to middle Australia, it’s a slap in the face to democracy and a low blow to the compulsory vote system. Gillard lost the election more than Abbot won the election, the people did speak and they were not listened to. I only hope that this is short lived as I don't believe the public will allow such reckless abandonment of our democratic rights to be compromised in such away again. Mr Windsor you have no political credibility, you have sold out the very people you represent, you acknowledged what the people wanted in your speech but you failed to act. Mr Oakeshott, I am not familiar with your electorate but I fear you have exhausted your 15 minutes of fame and there will be only a bag of hot air to show for it at the end.
Posted by David, 8/09/2010 5:54:10 AM
Good luck to Tony Windsor! He will need every bit of luck as the Govt. he has chosen to support unwinds. Mr. Windsor will be held very accountable for what is now going to happen to Australia. He has disenfranchised many of his constituents by his action. The rumour is that he will not run again so obviously he doesn't care! He has given his support to the thugs who got rid of Kevin Rudd and who engineered NSW into the basket case and political farce it now is. All we have to do is watch and wait. In the eyes of many Australians Tony Windsor is a truly hollow man. He and the person from Port knew all along they wouldn't support he Coalition.Yet they grandstanded and grabbed every photo opp. they could. Oakeshotts painful speech yesterday should warn eveyone what is going to happen. Did Mr Windsor know Oakeshott was to be given a ministry in a Labot Govt? Love to know?
Posted by Cagey, 8/09/2010 7:46:13 AM
You might want to ask Tony why he settled for $20 million then when Rob Oakeshott is getting $130 million for his electorate.
Posted by iamsuey, 8/09/2010 7:51:03 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
07 September, 2010
MULTIMEDIA
07 September, 2010

Most popular articles




Barossa & Light Herald







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...